Tuesday, May 25, 2010

32 - Columbine

Columbine by Dave Cullen
Twelve Books, 2009
417 pages
Date completed: May 25, 2010


Columbine by Dave Cullen is without a doubt the most disturbing book I have ever read, but in the most compelling way possible. Wow. I chose it because I was so young when the attacks occurred, and so I didn’t know much about them and wanted to be better informed. Cullen’s account of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebolds’ shooting spree in Columbine High School was certainly worthwhile. Cullen, a journalist who has been involved with the Columbine shooting case since the day it occurred, provides a thorough account of the shootings, the aftermath of the attack, the killers, and their motives. Utilizing police reports, interviews with survivors and investigators, the papers and videos of Harris and Klebold, and the research of other journalists, Cullen compiles a detailed and compelling account of April 20, 1999.

Cullen states that it is important to document and understand the Columbine attack in order to prevent future attacks. His depiction definitely succeeds in capturing the spirit of the event—often, I was so freaked out by what I was reading (phrases such as “Eric and Dylan planned to be dead shortly after the weekend” and “Danny[‘s body] lay out on that sidewalk for twenty-eight hours” (103) come to mind) that I had to stop reading. Obviously Cullen is purposely sensational sometimes in order to make his point, but it was nevertheless difficult to wrap my head around the fact that the attack really happened, and so reading this in large doses was not always possible for me. I had to stop reading it after around 8 or 9 p.m., since if I didn't, I got nightmares.

The more I read the book, the more unsettling it became. I learned a lot from the reading that I had never known previously: chilling facts surfaced constantly, such as the fact while planning their attack, Harris and Klebold intended for it to be more of a massacre. Although they ended up killing thirteen people in addition to themselves, they originally had a three-stage plan: first, massive bombs would explode in crowded hubs throughout the school, destroying part of the building and killing at least 800 people; then Harris and Klebold would stand at the school’s two most popular entrances with machine guns in order to slaughter escaping survivors; and finally, they had rigged their cars with massive explosives designed to decimate the police and journalists swarming the school after their suicides. I had had no idea that the attack was meant so grisly (not that it wasn’t horrifying anyway—a simple Google search of “Dylan Klebold” immediately yields a photograph of Harris and Klebold dead on the Columbine library floor, with blood splattered and pooled under the gaping gunshot wounds in their heads).

One really interesting aspect of the book was that it explored the many assumptions and stereotypes associated with both Columbine and with school shootings in general. People tend to assume that Harris and Klebold fit the generic stereotype of school shooters—that they were Goth, trenchcoat-wearing, anti-Christian outcasts whose intention was to take revenge on the popular students and jocks at their school. In reality, there is no established "school shooter profile." Harris and Klebold were both relatively popular in the sense that they both had a great deal of friends, and Harris was quite the ladies’ man. Klebold was deeply faithful, and neither Harris nor Klebold were Goth, although they did wear trenchcoats to conceal their weapons during the attack.

The other prevalent rumor is the one surrounding Cassie Bernall, the girl who was reportedly shot to death after admitting that she believed in God. This, too, proved to be a rumor, and never actually occurred: people assumed that Cassie’s faith must have played a role in her death, and since the assumption that the shooters were anti-Christian was already in place, the result is a rumor that combines the previous two assumptions to insinuate that Cassie was a martyr. It doesn't help that an exchange similar to the alleged conversation with Cassie actually did occur between Klebold and another girl, Valeen Schnurr.

Overall, Cullen’s book covers all of the bases, providing everything from a play-by-play of the shootings and their aftermath to an extensive portrait of Harris and Klebolds’ personalities, childhoods, journals, and videotapes. Cullen provides a stunning portrait of a disaster that shocked America, and I loved reading it. The book was quite disturbing, but so was the Columbine massacre, and I think it would be difficult to hear about any such disaster without feeling an overwhelming sense of hopelessness and loss. This type of book is informative and, to me, important and even essential to understanding disaster and living through it. I respect Cullen’s book for its integrity and for its success in covering every angle of the Columbine massacre. What a powerful book.

10 comments:

Dave Cullen said...

Really nice review, Leslie. Thanks very much for such a thoughtful read of my book. I too was amazed by the eagerness of some to glom onto the "obvious" answers, which didn't happen to fit the data. (Some still cling to those ideas.)

There's lots more info at my Columbine site.

I just created a Students Page, and we now have a Discussion Board on facebook.

Unknown said...

Cullen perpetuates the long-standing myth that Dylan was a sad little emo follower who was totally led by Harris.

The truth is that Dylan was the one who wrote about going on a killing spree before Eric; he even wanted to do it with someone else.

(Keep in mind that Eric and Dylan intended the massacre to be a bombing event with a shooting element. Their plans went awry.)

...

On Monday, November 3, 1997, Dylan wrote in his journal:

"[edited] will get me a gun, ill go on my killing spree against anyone I want. more crazy...deeper in the spiral, lost highway repeating, dwelling on the beautiful past, ([edited] & [edited] gettin drunk) w. me, everyone moves up i always stayed. Abandonment. this room sux. wanna die."

He wrote "*my* killing spree", not "*our* killing spree".

...

Those who have seen the basement tapes have said that, on them, Dylan appears far more eager and enthusiastic than Eric.

On the tapes, Eric apologizes to his family; Dylan does not.

On one tape, Eric is seen alone, tearing up when he thinks about his friends back in Michigan. He even turns the tape off so he will not be captured crying on camera.

If he truly was a pure psychopath, as Cullen claims, is it likely that he would have cried while thinking about old friends?

...

Cullen writes that Dylan had doubts about "going NBK" - NBK was the killers' code word for the massacre - *during* the attack. One wonders how he came to this conclusion.

At the school on 4/20, Dylan was the one who seemed to be enjoying himself. Eric was subdued in comparison.

At one point, Dylan saw one of his victims writhing in pain.

"Here, let me help you," he said - and shot the boy in the face.

Was that the action of someone who had doubts about what he was doing?

...

This is not the forum for a thorough debunking of Cullen's claims. The bottom line is that the book, while useful in some respects, is *not* the definitive, myth-busting account it purports to be.

Read Mr. Cullen's book, but also read Columbine: A True Crime Story" by Jeff Kass; "No Easy Answers" by Brooks Brown; "Comprehending Columbine" by Ralph Larkin; and as many other books as you can find. Read the killers' journals and other writings (www.acolumbinesite.com is a good starting point). Read the documents (*very* begrudgingly) released by law enforcement over the years.

Keep an open mind and remember that the "truth" is always very elusive.

Unknown said...

Cullen claims that Eric Harris was a swaggering ladies' man and confident social king. This assertion is ludicrous.

Cullen writes that Eric "got lots of girls" and had sex with a 24-year-old woman named Brenda Parker. He even quotes Parker in his book. The truth is that Parker had no connection to Harris or the tragedy; she was a "fangirl" who sought attention by making up stories. She has *zero* credibility.

Eric tried to get a date to the prom; he failed. He asked several girls, all of whom turned him down. He finally convinced a girl he met at the pizza place where he worked to spend a couple of hours at his house on the night of the prom; they watched a movie. She declined to attend the after-prom party with him, so he went alone.

Harris was fairly short (5'8") and very skinny, with a deformed chest due to his pelvus excavatum. As his body language in the following video (recorded in a hallway at Columbine and shown in a documentary about the massacre) demonstrates, he was no match for the larger boys he encountered on a daily basis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZix8_7f_lY

In his final journal entry, Eric wrote:

"I hate you people for leaving me out of so many fun things. And no don't --- say, "well thats your fault" because it isnt, you people had my phone #, and I asked and all, but no. no no no dont let the weird looking Eric KID come along, ohh --- nooo."

Does that sound like someone who was confident and socially successful?

gm said...

Cullen , who first reported on the story for the online magazine Salon, acknowledges in the book's source notes that thoughts he attributes to Klebold and Harris are conjecture gleaned from the record the pair left behind.

Jeff Kass takes a more straightforward approach in "Columbine: A True Crime Story," working backward from the events of the fateful day.
The Denver Post

Mr. Cullen insists that the killers enjoyed "far more friends than the average adolescent," with Harris in particular being a regular Casanova who "on the ultimate high school scorecard . . . outscored much of the football team." The author's footnotes do not reveal how he knows this; when I asked him about it while preparing this review, Mr. Cullen said he did not necessarily mean to imply that Harris was sexually active. But what else would such words mean?

"Eric and Dylan never had any girlfriends," the more sober Mr. Kass writes, and were "probably virgins upon death."
Wall Street Journal

Unknown said...

I see that my first two comments have not gone through.

(I was going to post them as one, but I ran afoul of the word limit.)

If the previous comment was rejected, please consider posting the following:

Dave Cullen's book is well-written and contains interesting information not found elsewhere, but it is not the definitive, myth-busting account it purports to be.

For alternative perspectives on the Columbine massacre, read:

Columbine: A True Crime Story
by Jeff Kass

No Easy Answers
by Brooks Brown

Comprehending Columbine
by Ralph Larkin

There are several others, but those three should get you started.

Read the killers' own writings (available online; a good starting point is www.acolumbinesite.com, with which I am *not* affiliated.)

Read the thousands of pages of documents released (*very* begrudgingly) by law enforcement.

Keep an open mind and remember that the "truth" is always very elusive.

Anonymous said...

Dylan deeply faithful? To what? God? I hope that's not what Cullen meant (never read, don't really plan to) but if you've seen the basement tape transcripts... he makes fun of Christians.

Ever read "No Easy Answers" by Brooks Brown? MUCH better account, by someone who was there and was friends with them both. I would trust him and the Columbine Report more than anything else.

Leslie said...

@Dave Cullen

Thank you so much for reading it, Mr. Cullen! I'll definitely check out the website. I meant to do that after I finished your book, but it totally slipped my mind.

Leslie said...

@Kyle

Hey Kyle! I didn't mean to leave your comments unpublished for so long; it's been a few days since I've logged on, so I didn't see that I had all of these comments.

You definitely make a ton of good points about Eric and Dylans' personalities (with a ton of backup info-- I appreciate that). At some point, I'll have to read a few more books about Columbine so that I can see a wider variety of viewpoints. I can't argue with what you said, since I don't have any experience with Columbine other than this book, so I can't really react much to what you said other than to say that I'm always open to new ways of thinking about things, and so what you said was definitely valuable.

The one thing I can mention is that maybe Eric was feigning the tears in order to appear repentant? Psychopaths are very good at faking emotions to evoke a certain response, so maybe Eric wanted people in the future to think that he was choked up? Just a thought.

I'll keep what you said in mind-- and I totally agree with your final statement. The truth is elusive. I'm sure none of the published accounts are entirely factual-- that would be impossible.

Leslie said...

@gm

Very interesting! Good to know-- I also got the impression that he was sexually active.

Leslie said...

@thevirus8792

I guess "deeply faithful" was an exaggeration on my part-- there's a part in Cullen's book where he says that Dylan definitely believed in God:

"[Dylan] was a profoundly religious man. His family was not active in any congregation, yet Dylan's belief was unwavering. He believed in God without question, but constantly challenged His choices." (p. 174)

I have not yet read the basement tape transcripts or the Brooks Brown book, but I'd be really interested in an account written by him! His part of the story was particularly compelling for me.

Post a Comment